!@#$!@! schreef op 8 februari 2020 14:36:
[...]
Alles is allang besproken en weerlegd, je bent niet origineel en je komt niet met nieuwe informatie. Het enige wat je doet is jezelf en andere ontkenners herhalen.
Hier wat feiten voor je om te negeren. Dan kan je na deze post vooral niet ingaan op de wetenschappelijke argumenten, met emotionele argumenten komen en jezelf herhalen waarom het allemaal niet klopt terwijl je de feiten blijft negeren. :-)
skepticalscience.com/co2-lags-tempera...To claim that the CO2 lag disproves the warming effect of CO2 displays a lack of understanding of the processes that drive Milankovitch cycles. A review of the peer reviewed research into past periods of deglaciation tells us several things:
-Deglaciation is not initiated by CO2 but by orbital cycles
-CO2 amplifies the warming which cannot be explained by orbital cycles alone
-CO2 spreads warming throughout the planet
Overall, more than 90% of the glacial-interglacial warming occurs after the atmospheric CO2 increase (Figure 3).
Extra info:
scienceblogs.com/illconsidered/2006/0...There are also events in geological history where sharp rises in temperature appear to be initiated as well as driven high by very large spikes in greenhouse gases not unlike what fossil fuel emissions are on the way to being today. The Paleocene Eocene Thermal Maximum is such a case. Roughly 55 million years ago, ocean pH levels dropped drastically and global temperatures rapidly rose over 5oC. The resolution of proxy records that are available indicate that this happened in a period of time no longer than 5K years, but it is not possible to know if it happened even faster. The likely cause of this event was massive releases of methane from the ocean floors, perhaps due to some smaller warming or changes in sea level. It took over 100K years for the ocean, atmosphere and temperatures to return to their previous state.
The result was a mass extinction event that took millions of years to recover from.